Pay in installments of $6.43 with
,
and
Shipping Estimate
USA
- USA
- CAN
- USA
- CAN
Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Jul 6 - Jul 11
Promo Codes Available:
For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15
Description
nemo firefly 2p tent Nemo Dragonfly OSMO UL 2P Tent – Trailful Outdoor CoDragonfly OSMO offers an ideal balance of weight and livability in a freestanding tent, and its now made with NEMOs proprietary OSMO fabric for enhanced performance and sustainability. Several years in the making, our OSMO 100% recycled composite fabric is PFAS free, repels water 4x longer, and stretches 3x less when wet all while boasting a 20% increase in strength compared to similar fabrics. Dragonfly OSMO features generously sized doors and
Dragonfly OSMO™ offers an ideal balance of weight and livability in a freestanding tent, and it’s now made with NEMO’s proprietary OSMO™ fabric for enhanced performance and sustainability. Several years in the making, our OSMO 100% recycled composite fabric is PFAS-free, repels water 4x longer, and stretches 3x less when wet — all while boasting a 20% increase in strength compared to similar fabrics.
Dragonfly OSMO features generously sized doors and asymmetrical vestibules for easy entry and access to bulkier gear. Inside, a gear loft and gear pockets keep belongings neatly stored and out of the way, while an overhead Nightlight Pocket™ casts headlamp light with a warm, even glow. Best-in-class, durable Y stakes and Jake’s Foot pole clips are included to make the pitching process even smoother and more secure. Our updated Divvy Cube™ stuff sack allows for easily splitting the weight with a partner and stows more efficiently in your pack.
Features
- High-performance, high-strength OSMO™ poly-nylon ripstop fabric has 4x better water repellency and 3x less stretch when wet. OSMO fabric is made from 100% recycled yarns that are PFAS-free and meet flame retardancy standards without the use of added chemicals.
- Generous doors and asymmetrical vestibules for each person with Gatekeeper™ door tiebacks provide more coverage and ease of entry.
- Hubbed, pre-bent DAC Featherlite® NFL poles with high-arching main pole significantly increase volume at the head, peak, and foot ends.
- Color-coded anodized poles, matched webbing, and Jake’s Foot pole clips for an intuitive setup.
- bluesign® approved fly & floor materials meet strict ecological and chemical requirements and have been produced with a minimum impact on people and the planet.
- White no-see-um mesh panels add privacy while a black mesh top offers clear stargazing at night.
- Single-seam tub construction and silicone-impregnated fabric ensure increased longevity and greater sustainability.
- Overhead Nightlight Pocket™ turns your headlamp into a tent lantern while removing blue light and casting an even glow.
- Divvy Cube™ rectangular stuff sack allows you to still split the weight with your partner, but packs more efficiently in your backpack.
- Integrated gear loft and generous gear pockets offer storage for personal items.
- Protected strut vents at the top of each zipper flap ensure greater ventilation, especially during a storm.
| Capacity | 2 Person |
|---|---|
| Season | 3 |
| Minimum Weight | 2 lb, 10 oz / 1.2 kg |
| Packed Weight | 3 lb, 2 oz / 1.41 kg |
| Packed Size | 19.5 x 5.5 x 3.5 in / 50 x 14 x 9 cm |
| Peak Height | 41 in / 105 cm |
| Floor Area | 29.0 sq ft / 2.7 sq m |
| Floor Dimensions | 88 x 50/45 in / 223.52 x 127/114 cm |
| Vestibule Area | 10.0 sq ft / 0.9 sq m |
| Freestanding | Freestanding |
| Door Quantity | 2 |
| Vestibule Quantity | 2 |
| Canopy Fabric | 10D Nylon Ripstop/ No-See-Um Mesh |
| Fly Fabric | OSMO |
| Color | Birch Bud/Goodnight Gray |
| Stuff Sack | Divvy Cube |
| Rainfly Fabric | 0D OSMO Ripstop (1500 mm) |
Shipping Notes
- Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
- Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
- Delivery to the USA:
- Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
- If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
- We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
- Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
- To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
- Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
4.4 ★★★★★
Based on 934 reviews
Sort
Product Reviews
★★★★★ 5
A great reference for Biblical factual archeology
Format: Paperback
I just received this book and I am so excited. It is a great tool and reference for Biblical studies. Each artifact has a great photograph next to the quick eye catching dates, discovery, period, keywords and Biblical passage. Then a brief but to the point description. It is simple and effective. Very easy to refer when reading your Bible or if you are just interested in archeology. Each artifact is about 2 pages and nothing more which is perfect for references. What a great book!
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on March 1, 2025
★★★★★ 5
Excellent and in-depth archeologic finds that authenticate Bible history.
Format: Paperback
Archeology is proving much of the Bible's history as true. This book really delves into various sites and provides a lot of detail. My type of reading.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on February 21, 2026
★★★★★ 5
Great information and pictures
Format: Paperback
Great information on Biblical sites, beautiful pictures, and a pretty book as well. I gave several of these to my family for Christmas. Everyone seemed to love them. The only thing I will caution you about is that the book is small.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on January 22, 2026
★★★★★ 4
Knowledgeable and delectable book.
Format: Paperback
This book shows an excellent archaeological evidence of the Bible accuracy of places, names, events, etc. and proving for the Christians that the Bible is a historical document as well as the inspired inerrant word of God.
The majority of the book is interesting and delectable, I mean, the pages where the author presents archaeological facts such as the artifacts and their correlation with people, places times, events and practices recorded in the Bible. But I do not like when the author make personal assumptions and do not present any proof of that. He says: it probably be…. it may be… Here I show three cases of this conjectures;:
1.The author seems to affirm that the triumphal entry of Jesus into Jerusalem, or at least, the name of this event, was derived from the Roman triumph celebration. He says (page 231), regarding to the Roman Empire and the life of Jesus: “By the time of Jesus, the requirements and meaning of a triumphal entry had shifted slightly from its earlier roots associating it with a conquering hero, as it became even more significant and representative of kingship and divinity”. He continues to say: “In ancient Roman culture, a triumphant victor, known as vir triumphalis (“man of triumph”) would enter the city in a celebration parade wearing the laurel wreath and a purple garment, which identified him with the royal and the divine, while riding in a chariot pulled by four horses, alluding to Sol the sun god”.
But if we compare the Roman triumph celebration with the entry of Jesus into Jerusalem described in the Bible, it is not derived from the Roman culture but is the exact fulfillment of the prophesy of Zechariah 9:9. I do not see any correlation between the two celebration; Jesus did not ride a horse but a donkey to signify peace, meekness and humility. It was not a pompous entrance of a conquering hero or king wearing a expensive garment and royal crown.
2.Even though, it is not possible to identify the location of the tomb of Jesus with absolute certainty; the author states (page 199) that the tomb of Jesus is located at the Church of the Holy Sepulchre possible based on “the restoration work to the edicule and an arcosolium tomb from the Roman period found in the church of the Holy Sepulchre”. The author also affirms without giving any proof that: “Christians in Jerusalem then passed down a continuous memory of the location of the tomb (of Jesus) from the time of the burial and resurrection in AD33 until construction of the Church of the Holy Sepulchre was started in about AD326”. But where are the records of that time? The author probably based his statement on Eusebius who lived in the 3rd and 4th centuries AD.
According to the history , the Church of the Holy Sepulchre was built by the Roman Emperor Constantine around 326 AD, when her mother the Queen Helena, wanted to replace the pagan temples with Christian churches; she met the Bishop Macarious of Jerusalem who determined the location where Jesus had been buried at the place where was a temple to the Greek goddess Venus. At the beginning of the construction of the church, a rock-cut tomb was found there and an edicule was built to protect the site. But later the edicule was destroyed and rebuild. More tombs has been found under this church. How to be sure or verify that this rock-cut tomb was the one where Jesus was buried?
3.The author is biased with respect to the Masoretic Text, he make a statement but does not support it with any evidence in this regard. Writing about the Dead Sea Scrolls (Page 173) he states: “And certain passages in the Masoretic text seem to have been intentionally modified to match ideas and theology of medieval Judaism.” it is a bad accusation.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on April 23, 2021
★★★★★ 5
Great Worth
Format: Paperback
The Book That Must Be Read!
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on April 18, 2026
recommand products
MindShift Gear Rotation 180 22L Photo Backpack, Color Green, Size Medium: Up to 1 2 Bodies/2 4 Lenses/Acc, 20x12x8"
21.29
Metal Gear Solid 5 The Phantom Pain Snake Biker Leather Jacket 2XL
21.52
Union Grove Pro Soft Shell Headgear
27.88
Direct Drive Extruder for SV07/Plus
29.74
23068 The Flash Banger 777 Music Box
23.55